|
Shifting
to a market oriented research strategy
In
Africa, research has traditionally taken a production
orientation to improve yield. This strategy assumes
that market demand exists for increased production and
the starting point for the research agenda is the prioritisation
of production constraints. Whilst this approach has
been successful in the past, it is unclear whether this
approach alone will continue to provide reasonable returns
on research investment in the next 10-20 years. An alternative
approach is to adopt a market oriented approach, where
the market is the driving force in the system. In this
case no assumptions are necessary and the starting point
for the researcher is the identification of market opportunities
for research and technology intervention. The advantage
of taking a market-oriented approach to a project from
the outset is that the research agenda and research
themes, focus on factors which can be reflected in economic
returns.
Given
a project goal, which aims for increased revenue based
on the sales of a particular product, the related work
plans, time frames and indicators can take on an economic
reality and the technology development becomes integral
to the process of technology transfer. For processing
projects to have the best possibility of sustainable
success, there are obvious advantages in adopting a
market-oriented strategy, as the work is involved with
manipulating and supplying market demands. The following
sections briefly describe the process of developing
a market driven research agenda, towards the end goal
of deploying agro-enterprise projects. The first two
sections deal with strategy and the following sections
detail the research issues.
The
"Stage Gate" method for market analysis and
product intervention
Taking
an agricultural product from the ideas phase to commercialisation
involves as series of decisions and actions based on
economic, technical and organisational issues. The "stage
gate" method is a management tool designed to assist
a team in developing a marketing and research plan,
whilst accommodating individuals from diverse organisations
/ backgrounds, Figure 1. The main assumption of this
process is that the projects most important determinant
is profit and that the project should be rejected at
any one, of a series of stages and gates, if one of
the partners or "gate keepers" questions /
disagrees with the viability of the plan.
The
group of people that make up a stage-gate team should
include a person from, research, extension, marketing,
production, processing, accountancy and distribution.
For a typical agricultural product this would equate
to a researcher, a Government / NGO extension worker,
a farmer, an entrepreneur, and an accountant / economist.
Obviously, all persons should be motivated towards the
success of the project, but the team should work with
the understanding that the market will only accept a
product that is either in demand, fills a real economic
gap or can be seen to create wealth. Marketing from
a top down approach or with only a missionary zeal,
is unlikely to succeed.
As
a prelude to the process, the team should assess all
current ideas on the drawing board and conduct in-depth
market research to find the level of demand for a product
and the alternatives. The team should find out what
is available on the market and then develop a price
/ season profile, a list of competitive products and
an accurate cost of the new technology relative to the
value adding factor. It is widely accepted that adding
cost to new products is easily achieved, but increasing
value and profit with a new technology is more challenging.
Successful new or improved products typically fit into
two categories:-
(i)
Pure added value, i.e. a product that clearly
supersedes previous products,
(ii)
Me Too, products that can do the same job, faster,
cheaper and better
The introduction of a new "concept" product
tends towards pure added value, whereas a product that
is based on improved efficiency is more of a "Me
Too" product. Agricultural products or technologies
can include both of these activities as some products
may be entirely new and others may be more efficient.
Although
the stage-gate method is a useful tool to help partners
focus on the market and avoid plunging into an investment
in the absence of a considered economic framework, it
should be noted that this method was designed to operate
within a relatively sophisticated private sector system.
Applying the same principles within a developing country
economy requires some adjustments. As market uptake
periods may be relatively long term, and consumers will
take time to become aware of a new product and due to
restricted disposable incomes may be cautious in adopting
new products.
Hence,
in addition to the purely profit driven goal, projects,
particularly those aimed at small scale farmers and
processors, require the inclusion of a fair degree of
developmental perspective, i.e. to improve the lot of
the rural and urban poor communities. Hence in addition
to profit motive, the project should anticipate a slow
initial rate of market impact as the project goals include
broader issues such as food security, food safety, and
access to high nutrient foods and the creation of new
opportunities for entrepreneurs. The stage gate approach
is therefore best viewed as a guide towards market intervention
and this approach is extremely useful as it enables
research teams to work together and change their approach
or perspective towards technology intervention within
the agri-business system.
Steps
in the stage gate method a process approach to market
intervention
1.
Ideas assessment Collation of all ideas relating to
postharvest products from a selected commodity
(At
this stage an opportunistic approach is needed, i.e.
this is not constraint driven, the group should assess
all the possible products from a commodity and select
those which show highest market potential. The team
is working on the principle of championing a product)
 |
Proceed
to next stage if all partners agree
Open
gate?
|
2.
Desk study A table of strengths and weaknesses of technologies
(There
are a number of marketing checklists, which provide
a series of issues, which should be addressed before
embarking on a project. These include product price,
competitors, distribution, seasonal effects etc.)
 |
Proceed
to next stage if all partners agree
Open
gate?
|
3.
Assignments Gather all relevant information especially
from outside the system
(This
involves finding the common ground between the players
in the group and identifying the project within the
framework of local and national Mkts policy etc.)
 |
Proceed
to next stage if all partners agree
Open
gate?
|
4.
Project group Select group and composition with a lead
agent / a "champion"
 |
Proceed
to next stage if all partners agree
Open
gate?
|
5.
Establish a pilot plant so that research and commercial
partners gain information on running the scheme
 |
Proceed
to next stage if all partners agree
Open
gate?
|
6.
Critical issues Assess the most precarious aspects of
project, faultfinding mission
(an
accountant is crucial at this stage)
 |
Proceed
to next stage if all partners agree
Open
gate?
|
7.
Investment proposal Need to approach partners (Private
sector, NGO, Donor)
 |
Proceed
to next stage if all partners agree
Open
gate?
|
8.
Test marketing - Attention to tailoring the product
to the market requirement
 |
Proceed
to next stage if all partners agree
Open
gate?
|
9.
Launch /transition Need to focus finances on sales,
promotion and education
 |
Proceed
to next stage if all partners agree
Open
gate?
|
10.
Impact Monitoring and evaluation
To
absorb some of the developmental issues within an economic
framework, the International Agricultural Research Centres
(IARC's), particularly (CIAT), have developed an agro-enterprise
approach, which is called the "Integrated project
approach". This method is particularly suited to
assisting small-medium scale farmers in developing countries.
This more developmental approach to market intervention
is described two training manuals "Adding
Value to Root and Tuber crops" and "Identifying
and Assessing Marketing Opportunities for Small Rural
Producers" . Essentially these texts guide
the researcher through the stages described in the stage-gate
process, involving, assessment of product possibilities,
identification of market opportunities, development
or adaptation of technologies, development of community
organisatoins, pilot testing of commercial enterprises
with small rural production / processing groups and
the development of sustainable market linkages.
Depending
on the product, the project incorporates simple sub-sector
marketing procedures for market identification and evaluation,
proposes participatory techniques to adapt processing
technologies to specific locations and only moves to
commercial teams once profitability has been demonstrated
and management skills developed. Once teams show commercial
viability the research / development team disengages.
This
approach has been successfully implemented in both Latin
America and Asia and case studies documented. Economic
impact studies conducted by CIAT, show that "integrated
projects" in Colombia, have generated economic
benefits payoffs of US$ 15-18, for each 1 dollar invested.
This approach is being applied to projects in Africa
with successful results and FOODNET will seek to promote
this methodology in the ASARECA region.

>Home >Agro-enterprises
>
Strategies for commercialisation
|